In vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of nanoliposomal formulations upon coating with trimethylchitosan polymer

Authors

1 Department of Food and Drug Control, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Nuclear Medicine Department of Imamreza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Nanotechnology Research Center and School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10.7508/nmj.2014.03.004

Abstract

Objective(s):
Drug delivery via mucosal routes has been confirmed to be effective in inducing strong immune responses. Liposomes could enhance immune responses and mucoadhesive potentials, make them useful mucosal drug delivery systems. Coating of liposomes by mucoadhesive polymers succeeded in enhancing immune responses. Our studies aim at preparation and characterization of trimethylchitosan-coated nanoliposomes for nasal delivery of a model antigen, tetanus toxoid (TT).
 
Materials and Methods:
Anionic liposomes were prepared by dehydration-rehydration method with an average size of 100 nm and were coated with 0.01% (w/v) solution of trimethyulchitosan (TMC) with 50±10% of quaternization. Surface properties and zeta potential were evaluated by DLS. Antigen stability and integrity were studied by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Nasal clearance rate and mucoadhesive properties of liposomes were studied by gamma scintigraphy method using 99mTc-labelled liposomes.  
Results:
The zeta potential of non-coated and TMC-coated liposomes was -40 and +38.8, respectively. Encapsulation rate of tetanus toxoid was 77 ± 5.5%. SDS-PAGE revealed that the antigens remained intact during formulation procedure. Gamma scintigraphy confirmed that both types of liposomes could remain in nasal cavity up to ten folds over the normal residence time for conventional nasal formulations.  
Conclusion:
TMC-coated nanoliposomes have several positive potentials including good mucoadhesive properties, preserved integrity of loaded antigen and presence of TMC as a mucoadhesive polymer with innate immunoadjuvant potential which make them suitable for efficient adjuvant/delivery system.

Keywords


1. Tafaghodi M, Jaafari MR, Sajadi Tabassi SA. Nasal immunization studies using liposomes loaded with tetanus toxoid and CpG-ODN. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006; 64: 138-145.

2. Tafaghodi M, Saluja V, Kersten GF, Kraan H, Slütter B, Amorij JP, et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen nanoparticles coated with chitosan and trimethyl chitosan: impact of formulation on physicochemical and immunological characteristics. Vaccine. 2012; 30(36): 5341-5348. 

3. Zaman M, Chandrudu S, Toth I. Strategies for intranasal delivery of vaccines. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2013; 3: 100-109.

4. Almeida AJ, Alpar HO. Nasal delivery of vaccines. J Drug Target. 1996; 3: 455-467.

5. Boyaka PN, Tafaro A, Fischer R, Leppla SH, Fujihashi K, McGhee JR. Effective mucosal immunity to anthrax: Neutralizing antibodies and Th cell responses following nasal immunization with protective antigen. J Immunol. 2003; 170: 5636-5643.

6. Golali E, Jaafari MR, Khamesipour A, Abbasi A, Saberi Z, Badiee A. Comparison of in vivo adjuvanticity of liposomal PO CpG odn with liposomal PS CpG ODN: Soluble leishmania antigens as a model. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012; 15: 1032-1045.

7. Heurtault B, Frisch B, Pons F. Liposomes as delivery systems for nasal vaccination: Strategies and outcomes. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010; 7: 829-844.

8. Jaafari MR, Tafaghodi M, Sajadi Tabassi SA. Evaluation of the clearance characteristics of liposomes in the human nose by gamma-scintigraphy. Iran J Pharm Res. 2010: 3-11.

9. Ferrari F, Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C, Karlsen J. Characterization of rheological and mucoadhesive properties of three grades of chitosan hydrochloride. Farmaco. 1997; 52: 493-497.

10. Harding SE. Mucoadhesive interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003; 31: 1036-1041.

11. Fujimura Y, Akisada T, Harada T, Haruma K. Uptake of microparticles into the epithelium of human nasopharyngeal lymphoid tissue. Med Mol Morphol. 2006; 39: 181-186.

12. Rossi S, Ferrari F, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C. Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride-mucin rheological interaction: influence of polymer concentration and polymer:mucin weight ratio. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001; 12: 479-485.

13. Rauw F, Gardin Y, Palya V, Anbari S, Gonze M, Lemaire S, et al. The positive adjuvant effect of chitosan on antigen-specific cell-mediated immunity after chickens’ vaccination with live Newcastle disease vaccine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010; 134: 249-258.

14. Ghendon Y, Markushin S, Krivtsov G, Akopova I. Chitosan as an adjuvant for parenterally administered inactivated influenza vaccines. Arch Virol. 2008; 153: 831-837.

15. Ranaldi G, Marigliano I, Vespignani I, Perozzi G, Sambuy Y. The effect of chitosan and other polycations on tight junction permeability in the human intestinal Caco-2 cell line. J Nutr Biochem. 2002; 13: 157-167.

16. Svindland SC, Jul-Larsen إ, Pathirana R, Andersen S, Madhun A, Montomoli E, et al. The mucosal and systemic immune responses elicited by a chitosan-adjuvanted intranasal influenza H5N1 vaccine. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012; 6: 90-100.

17. Elsabee MZ, Morsi RE, Al-Sabagh AM. Surface active properties of chitosan and its derivatives. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009; 74: 1-16.

18. Amidi M, Romeijn SG, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE, Bungener L, Huckriede A, et al. N-Trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles loaded with influenza subunit antigen for intranasal vaccination: Biological properties and immunogenicity in a mouse model. Vaccine. 2007; 25: 144-153.

19. Cao J, Sun J, Wang X, Li X, Deng Y. N-Trimethyl chitosan-coated multivesicular liposomes for oxymatrine oral delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2009; 35: 1339-1347.

20. Zhang J, Wang S. Topical use of Coenzyme Q10-loaded liposomes coated with trimethyl chitosan: Tolerance, precorneal retention and anti-cataract effect. Int J Pharm. 2009; 372: 66-75.

21. Huang A, Makhlof A, Ping Q, Tozuka Y, Takeuchi H. N-trimethyl chitosan-modified liposomes as carriers for oral delivery of salmon calcitonin. Drug Deliv. 2011; 18: 562-9.

22. Zarifpour M, Hadizadeh F, Iman M, Tafaghodi M. Preparation and Characterization of Trimethyl Chitosan Nanospheres Encapsulated with Tetanus Toxoid for Nasal Immunization Studies. Transport. 2013; 1:4.

23. Masayukl H, Masso M, Qing Y. Interaction between a novel amphiphilic polymer and liposomes. Supermol Sci. 1989; 5: 777-781.

24. Gonzلlez-Rodrیguez ML, Barros LB, Palma J, Gonzلlez-Rodrیguez PL, Rabasco AM. Application of statistical experimental design to study the formulation variables influencing the coating process of lidocaine liposomes. Int J Pharm. 2007; 337: 336-345.

25. Mourya VK, Inamdar NN. Trimethyl chitosan and its applications in drug delivery. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009; 20: 1057-1079.

26. Boonyo W, Junginger HE, Waranuch N, Polnok A, Pitaksuteepong T. Chitosan and trimethyl chitosan chloride (TMC) as adjuvants for inducing immune responses to ovalbumin in mice following nasal administration. J Control Release. 2007; 121: 168-175.

27. Amin M, Jaafari MR, Tafaghodi M. Impact of chitosan coating of anionic liposomes on clearance rate, mucosal and systemic immune responses following nasal administration in rabbits. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009; 74: 225-229.

28. L. Illum, H. Jّrgensen, H. Bisgaard, O. Krogsgaard, N. Rossing. Bioadhesive microspheres as a potential nasal drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 1987; 39: 189-199.

29. Takeuchi H, Matsui Y, Sugihara H, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. Effectiveness of submicron-sized, chitosan-coated liposomes in oral administration of peptide drugs. Int J Pharm. 2005; 303: 160-170.

30. Jubeh TT, Barenholz Y, Rubinstein A. Differential adhesion of normal and inflamed rat colonic mucosa by charged liposomes. Pharm Res. 2004; 21: 447-453.

31. Carvalho FC, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, Gremiمo MPD. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010; 46: 1-17.

32. Snyman D, Hamman JH, Kotze AF. Evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of N-trimethyl chitosan chloride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003; 29: 61-69.

33. Hagenaars N, Verheul RJ, Mooren I, de Jong PH, Mastrobattista E, Glansbeek HL, et al. Relationship between structure and adjuvanticity of N, N, N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) structural variants in a nasal influenza vaccine. J Control Release. 2009; 140: 126-133.

34. Verheul RJ, Amidi M, van Steenbergen MJ, van Riet E, Jiskoot W, Hennink WE. Influence of the degree of acetylation on the enzymatic degradation and in vitro biological properties of trimethylated chitosans. Biomaterials. 2009; 30: 3129-3135.

35. Cole AM, Liao H-I, Stuchlik O, Tilan J, Pohl J, Ganz T. Cationic polypeptides are required for antibacterial activity of human airway fluid. J Immunol. 2002; 169: 6985-6991.

36. Khatri K, Goyal AK, Gupta PN, Mishra N, Mehta A, Vyas SP. Surface modified liposomes for nasal delivery of DNA vaccine. Vaccine. 2008; 26: 2225-2233.

37. Mao S, Sun W, Kissel T. Chitosan-based formulations for delivery of DNA and siRNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010; 62: 12-27.