New CuO nanocomposite as non-enzymatic glucose biosensor

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Chemistry, Chemistry & Chemical Engineering Research Center of Iran (CCERCI), Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Chemistry, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Postal Code: 1913674711, Tehran, Iran

10.22038/nmj.2024.79481.1962

Abstract

Objective(s): In a new approach, copper(II) oxide (CuO) nanostructure was synthesized by a solvothermal method for applying as a biosensor for detecting of glucose. Determination of the glucose is important in controlling of diabetes. Non-enzymatic detection of glucose is preferable because of its low cost benefits. Otherwise, CuO can play a role in oxidation of glucose to gluconic acid which is important in glucose detection. Therefore, obtaining new morphology or new composite from CuO is interesting. 
Materials and Methods: CuO nanostructure was prepared with the assistance of a bifunctional amino acid of L-lysine (with the isoelectric point about 10 for precipitating copper ion) and an additive of urea. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cyclic voltammetry analyses and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were employed.
Results: XRD indicated that the synthesized CuO consists of a tenorite crystal system with a monoclinic structure. The TEM histogram showed a mean diameter of 91 nm for CuO nanostructure. CuO nanostructure loaded on graphene oxide-grafted Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LIS) to achieve CuO/LIS-g-GO composite. CuO/LIS-g-GO was dropped on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) to develop a new nanobiosensor for detecting glucose in a cost-effective manner without the necessity of using glucose oxidase or nafion. Phosphate buffer (PBS) and simulated body fluid (SBF) solutions were the media of the glucose detection. The sensitivity of the biosensor was 34.7 µA/cm2mM for 10 mM concentration of the glucose. The mentioned sensor detected no interference in the presence of dopamine and fructose. Also, the repeatability of the biosensor was investigated and the measured standard deviation (RSD) was 3.93%.
Conclusion: New nanostructured CuO was composited with LIS-g-GO and the new biosensor of CuO/LIS-g-GO/GCE was applied for the detection of glucose. The sensitivity of 34.7 µA/cm2mM without any interference of dopamine and fructose caused this system as favorite sensor for the detection of glucose. 

Keywords

References

  1. Lee H, Choi TK, Lee YB, Cho HR, Ghaffari R, Wang L, et al. A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2016;11(6): 566-572.
  2. Niu X, Li X, Pan J, He Y, Qiu F, Yan Y. Recent advances in non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors based on non-precious transition metal materials: opportunities and challenges. RSC Adv. 2016;6(88): 84893-84905.
  3. Fan Z, Liu B, Liu X, Li Z, Wang H, Yang S, et al. A flexible and disposable hybrid electrode based on Cu nanowires modified graphene transparent electrode for non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Electrochim. Acta. 2013;109: 602-608.
  4. Liu F, Wang C, Sui X, Riaz MA, Xu M, Wei L, et al. Synthesis of graphene materials by electrochemical exfoliation: Recent progress and future potential. Carbon Energ. 2019;1(2):173-199.
  5. Oorimi PG, Tarlani A, Zadmard R, Muzart J. Synthesis of photoluminescent composite based on graphene quantum dot@ ZIF-11: A novel sensor for extremely efficient nano-molar detection of CN–. Microchem J. 2023;189:108494-109502.
  6. Ji L, Meduri P, Agubra V, Xiao X, Alcoutlabi M. Graphene-based nanocomposites for energy storage. Adv Energy Mat. 2016;6(16):1502159 (1-73).
  7. Hota P, Miah M, Bose S, Dinda D, Ghorai UK, Su Y-K, et al. Ultra-small amorphous MoS2 decorated reduced graphene oxide for supercapacitor application. J Mat Sci Technol. 2020;40:196-203.
  8. Hu A, Li R, Bridges D, Zhou W, Bai S, Ma D, et al. Photonic nanomanufacturing of high performance energy devices on flexible substrates. J Laser Appl. 2016;28(2) 022602 (1-4).
  9. Nakate UT, Choudhury SP, Ahmad R, Patil P, Nakate YT, Hahn Y-B. Graphene oxide (GO) nanocomposite based room temperature gas sensor. Func. Nanomat.: Adv Gas Sens Technol. 2020:303-328.
  10. Bai Y, Xu T, Zhang X. Graphene-based biosensors for detection of biomarkers. Micromachines. 2020;11(1):60 (1-19).
  11. Mallick A, Mahapatra A, Mitra A, Greneche J-M, Ningthoujam R, Chakrabarti P. Magnetic properties and bio-medical applications in hyperthermia of lithium zinc ferrite nanoparticles integrated with reduced graphene oxide. Journal of Applied Physics. 2018;123(5) 055103 (1-9).
  12. Ghorbani M, Tarlani A, Taghvaei-Ganjali S, Malekzade M. Nanostructures Originated from Grafting Amino Group Containing Biomolecules on Graphene Oxide. ChemistrySelect. 2024;9(16):e202304045 (1-16).
  13. Khan M, Nagal V, Nakate UT, Khan MR, Khosla A, Ahmad R. Engineered CuO nanofibers with boosted non-enzymatic glucose sensing performance. J Electrochem Soc. 2021;168(6):067507 (1-8).
  14. Meher SK, Rao GR. Archetypal sandwich-structured CuO for high performance non-enzymatic sensing of glucose. Nanoscale. 2013;5(5):2089-2099.
  15. Song J, Xu L, Zhou C, Xing R, Dai Q, Liu D, et al. Synthesis of graphene oxide based CuO nanoparticles composite electrode for highly enhanced nonenzymatic glucose detection. ACS Applied Mat. Interfaces. 2013;5(24):12928-12934.
  16. Alizadeh T, Mirzagholipur S. A Nafion-free non-enzymatic amperometric glucose sensor based on copper oxide nanoparticles–graphene nanocomposite. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2014;198:438-447.
  17. Li Y, Huang F, Chen J, Mo T, Li S, Wang F, et al. A high performance enzyme-free glucose sensor based on the graphene-CuO nanocomposites. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8(5):6332-6342.
  18. Di Virgilio M, Basso Peressut A, Arosio V, Arrigoni A, Latorrata S, Dotelli G. Functional and environmental performances of novel electrolytic membranes for PEM fuel cells: a lab-scale case study. Clean Technol. 2023;5(1):74-93.
  19. Shams N, Lim HN, Hajian R, Yusof NA, Abdullah J, Sulaiman Y, et al. Electrochemical sensor based on gold nanoparticles/ethylenediamine-reduced graphene oxide for trace determination of fenitrothion in water. RSC Adv. 2016;6(92):89430-89439.
  20. Singh RK, Kumar R, Singh DP. Graphene oxide: strategies for synthesis, reduction and frontier applications. Rsc Adv. 2016;6(69):64993-65011.
  21. Chen D, Feng H, Li J. Graphene oxide: preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem Rev. 2012;112(11):6027-6053.
  22. Goodman DW. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (vyvanse), a prodrug stimulant for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pharm Therapeutics. 2010;35(5):273-287.
  23. Madaan V. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for childhood ADHD. Drugs of Today (Barcelona, Spain: 1998). 2008;44(5):319-324.
  24. Hummers Jr WS, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80(6):1339-1339.
  25. Yang J, Liu C, Gao L, Wang J, Xu Y, He R. Novel composite membranes of triazole modified graphene oxide and polybenzimidazole for high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell applications. Rsc Adv. 2015;5(122):101049-101054.
  26. Tarlani A, Fallah M, Lotfi B, Khazraei A, Golsanamlou S, Muzart J, et al. New ZnO nanostructures as non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;67:601-607.
  27. Khazraei A, Tarlani A, Eslami-Moghadam M, Muzart J. New Bi2MoO6 nano-shapes toward ultrasensitive enzymeless glucose tracing: Synergetic effect of the Bi-Mo association. Talanta. 2021;221:121560 (1-10).
  28. Surekha G, Krishnaiah KV, Ravi N, Suvarna RP. FTIR, Raman and XRD analysis of graphene oxide films prepared by modified Hummers method. J Phys: Conf Ser; 2020: IOP Publishing.1495 (2020) 012012 (1-6).
  29. M Hashem H, SM Hassan S, H Kamel A, Amr AE-GE, AbdelBary E. Cost-Effective Potentiometric Platforms Modified with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) and Based on Imprinted Receptors for Fluvoxamine Assessment. Polymers. 2020;12(3):673 (1-14).
  30. Mahalingam S, Ramasamy J, Ahn Y-H. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of synthetic dyes and industrial dye wastewater by hydrothermally synthesized G–CuO–Co 3 O 4 hybrid nanocomposites under visible light irradiation. J Cluster Sc. 2018;29:235-250.
  31. Vecera P, Chacón-Torres JC, Pichler T, Reich S, Soni HR, Görling A, et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Precise determination of graphene functionalization by in situ Raman spectroscopy. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15192 (1-9).
  32. Georgakilas V. Covalent attachment of organic functional groups on pristine graphene. Funct. Graphene C. 2014:21-58.
  33. Qiao S-J, Xu X-N, Qiu Y, Xiao H-C, Zhu Y-F. Simultaneous reduction and functionalization of graphene oxide by 4-hydrazinobenzenesulfonic acid for polymer nanocomposites. Nanomater. 2016;6(2):29 (1-10).
  34. Calos N, Forrester J, Schaffer G. A crystallographic contribution to the mechanism of a mechanically induced solid state reaction. J Solid State Chem. 1996;122(2):273-280.
  35. Fatima B, Siddiqui SI, Ahmad R, Linh NTT, Thai VN. CuO-ZnO-CdWO4: a sustainable and environmentally benign photocatalytic system for water cleansing. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(38):53793-53803.
  36. Zarafu I, Turcu I, Culiță DC, Petrescu S, Popa M, Chifiriuc MC, et al. Antimicrobial features of organic functionalized graphene-oxide with selected amines. Mater. 2018;11(9):1704 (1-10).
  37. Pravin M, Gnanamani A. Preparation, characterization and reusability efficacy of amine-functionalized graphene oxide-polyphenol oxidase complex for removal of phenol from aqueous phase. RSC Adv. 2018;8(67):38416-38424.
  38. Rout S. Synthesis and Characterization of CuO/graphene oxide composite 2013 (1-25).
  39. Stobinski L, Lesiak B, Malolepszy A, Mazurkiewicz M, Mierzwa B, Zemek J, et al. Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2014;195:145-154.
  40. Zang J, Li CM, Cui X, Wang J, Sun X, Dong H, et al. Tailoring zinc oxide nanowires for high performance amperometric glucose sensor. Electroanalysis: An Int J Devoted Fundament. Pract Asp Electroanal. 2007;19(9):1008-1014.
  41. Liu S, Yu B, Zhang T. A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on NiO hollow spheres. Electrochim Acta. 2013;102:104-107.
  42. Kiani M, Tehrani MA, Sayahi H. Reusable and robust high sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on Ni (OH)2 nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta. 2014;839:26-33.
  43. Xu W, Gao Q, Xu Y, Wu D, Sun Y, Shen W, et al. Controllable release of ibuprofen from size-adjustable and surface hydrophobic mesoporous silica spheres. Powd. Technol. 2009;191(1-2):13-20.
  44. Qian Y, Ye F, Xu J, Le Z-G. Synthesis of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles/graphene composite with an excellent electrocatalytic activity towards glucose. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7(10):10063-10073.
  45. Yu H-Y, Xu M-Q, Yu S-H, Zhao G-C. A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on CuO-graphene nanocomposites. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8(6):8050-8057.
  46. Liu M, Liu R, Chen W. Graphene wrapped Cu2O nanocubes: non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors for the detection of glucose and hydrogen peroxide with enhanced stability. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013;45:206-212.
  47. Xu F, Deng M, Li G, Chen S, Wang L. Electrochemical behavior of cuprous oxide–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites and their application in nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensing. Electrochim. Acta. 2013;88:59-65.
  48. Yuan B, Xu C, Liu L, Zhang Q, Ji S, Pi L, et al. Cu2O/NiOx/graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode for the enhanced electrochemical oxidation of reduced glutathione and nonenzyme glucose sensor. Electrochim. Acta. 2013;104:78-83.
Nanomedicine Journal
Volume 12, Issue 2
April 2025
Pages 252-261

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics